Page 6 of 12 FirstFirst ... 2345678910 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 116

Thread: Piggly-Wiggly

  1. #51
    Quote Originally Posted by Lum View Post
    If this is really Helena, then you know your original user name at AWE. What was it?
    FeelnSmurfy.

    DUH.
    Geraniums stink.

  2. #52
    Give me a harder one.
    Geraniums stink.

  3. #53
    LOL!

    Why so suspicious, Lummy?

  4. #54
    Quote Originally Posted by Helena View Post
    Give me a harder one.
    It's the medium, my dear. It abhors acceptance.

  5. #55
    Quote Originally Posted by Helena View Post
    Give me a harder one.
    Please try to keep up.



    Miami is so pretty this time of the evening, don't you think?

  6. #56
    Quote Originally Posted by Lum View Post
    Please try to keep up.



    Miami is so pretty this time of the evening, don't you think?
    Never.
    Geraniums stink.

  7. #57
    Get piggy wiggly, get piggy wiggly, do da ho down, we from da country, mannnnnn.



    Do da neckbone, do da neckbone, do da neckbone, do da conebread, do da conebread, get giggy wiggly, get giggy wiggly.

    I from da country, man.

  8. #58
    FLIPPING THE BIRD IS PROTECTED BY FIRST AMENDMENT, FEDERAL APPEALS COURT SAYS IN COP-STOP CASE

    The Taylor, Michigan, officer, Matthew Minard, pulled over Debra Cruise-Gulyas for speeding in June 2017 but gave her a ticket for a lesser violation. She flipped him the bird as she drove off. Minard pulled her over a second time and amended the ticket to the more serious speeding offense, according to the allegations.
    “Fits of rudeness or lack of gratitude may violate the golden rule,” Judge Jeffrey Sutton wrote in the panel opinion. “But that doesn’t make them illegal or for that matter punishable or for that matter grounds for a seizure.”
    http://www.first-amendment-audits.co...cop-stop-case/

    Yeah, you fuckers.


    Geraniums stink.

  9. #59
    Bravo!!
    TRUMP 2020


    ~ Shower the people you love with love ~

  10. #60
    AP: Police officer video regularly withheld from public view

    No shit.

    An investigation by The Associated Press has found that police departments routinely withhold video taken by body-worn and dashboard-mounted cameras that show officer-involved shootings and other uses of force. They often do so by citing a broad exemption to state open records laws — by claiming that releasing the video would undermine an ongoing investigation.
    During the last five years, taxpayers have spent hundreds of millions of dollars to outfit officers’ uniforms and vehicles with cameras and to store the footage they record as evidence. Body cameras, in particular, have been touted as a way to increase police transparency by allowing for a neutral view of whether an officer’s actions were justified. In reality, the videos can be withheld for months, years or even indefinitely, the AP review found.


    The AP tested the public’s ability to access police video for Sunshine Week, an annual celebration of open government, by filing open records requests related to roughly 20 recent use-of-force incidents in a dozen states.
    They were met with a series of denials and failed to unearth video of a single incident that had not already been released publicly. Some videos could be released in coming months or years once criminal and disciplinary investigations are concluded. By then, the public interest in knowing what happened may have waned significantly.
    In rejecting or delaying the requests, most law enforcement agencies and prosecutors cited exemptions that allow them to keep records of pending investigations secret. One county claimed the exemption would allow it to keep the video of a motorist’s fatal shooting secret forever — even though the investigation has concluded and cleared the deputy involved....

    Critics say the exemption is often misapplied to keep from public view video that might shine an unfavourable light on the actions of officers. The exemption is intended to protect sensitive details about investigations that might tip off suspects that they are under scrutiny or alert them to what evidence police have obtained. But when officers shoot or otherwise use force on suspects, they know their actions are the focus of the investigation and often have access to the videos of the incidents.
    “It is for that reason that the investigative records exemption literally makes no sense and should have no place when it comes to police body camera footage. It is a square peg in a round hole,” said Chad Marlow, an expert on laws governing body cameras at the American Civil Liberties Union. “We didn’t know that would end up being the get-out-of-FOIA free card for police departments, but it has certainly turned into that.”...

    Read more here: https://nationalpost.com/pmn/news-pm...om-public-view
    Geraniums stink.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •